【摘要】
本研究旨在比較臺灣西部符合與未符合特色化設計判準之公園遊戲場，在遊具類型配置與遊戲支持功能上的差異。採配額抽樣及實地檢核，選取北、中、南部共60處遊戲場，兩組各30處，並以描述性統計、卡方檢定及單因子多變量變異數分析進行分析。結果顯示，兩組在各類遊具設置比例上均未達顯著差異，主要配置皆為滑梯、攀爬設備及鞦韆。在九項遊戲支持功能中，六項未達顯著差異；其餘三項多變量檢定雖達顯著，差異僅見於個別子項。符合特色化設計判準組在感官設計變化及空間舒適子項得分較高；未符合組則在功能遊戲、體能及大肌肉活動子項得分較高。兩組在探索與材料操作相關功能上均偏低。整體而言，兩組在遊具配置及多數遊戲支持功能上未呈現明顯區隔，差異僅集中於少數子項。研究結果可供公園遊戲場規劃與評估參考。
This study compared park playgrounds in western Taiwan that either met or did not meet the distinctive design criteria in terms of playground equipment configurations and play-support functions. Quota sampling and field inspections were used to select 60 park playgrounds across the northern, central, and southern regions, resulting in 30 playgrounds in each of the two groups. The data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, chi-square tests, and one-way multivariate analysis of variance. The results revealed no significant between-group differences in the installation rates of any equipment type. Slides, climbing equipment, and swings were the predominant equipment types in both groups. Of the nine play-support functions examined, six showed no significant differences. Although the multivariate tests for the remaining three functions were significant, between-group differences were identified only in individual subitems. The group meeting the distinctive design criteria scored higher on the subitems of sensory design variation and spatial comfort, whereas the group not meeting the criteria scored higher on functional play, physical fitness, and gross motor activity. Both groups scored relatively low on functions related to exploration and material manipulation. Overall, the two groups showed no clear distinctions in playground equipment configurations or most play-support functions, and the differences were limited to a small number of subitems. These findings may inform the planning and evaluation of park playgrounds.
|